Girl Scouts: Teaching your daughter to hug relatives will make her vulnerable to rape later in life

A bizarre article that was published by the Girl Scouts of the United States of America calls into question whether the organization has any business being involved in your child’s life.

“Reminder: she doesn’t owe anyone a hug. Not even at the holidays,” says one of the largest youth organizations dedicated to the moral development of young American girls. And, they’re not talking about hugging strangers. They’re telling you not to teach your little girl that hugging relatives is normal.

In a perverse reflection of their own worldview, the author of the article suggests that by asking your daughter to hug her grandmother on Christmas, she might allow herself to be raped later in life. Go ahead and see for yourself:

Have you ever insisted, “Uncle just got here—go give him a big hug!” or “Auntie gave you that nice toy, go give her a kiss,” when you were worried your child might not offer affection on her own? If yes, you might want to reconsider the urge to do that in the future.

Think of it this way, telling your child that she owes someone a hug either just because she hasn’t seen this person in a while or because they gave her a gift can set the stage for her questioning whether she “owes” another person any type of physical affection when they’ve bought her dinner or done something else seemingly nice for her later in life.

Think of it this way, telling your child that she owes someone a hug either just because she hasn’t seen this person in a while or because they gave her a gift can set the stage for her questioning whether she “owes” another person any type of physical affection when they’ve bought her dinner or done something else seemingly nice for her later in life.

Essentially, they’re suggesting that a full grown woman will be unable to think critically because a few Thanksgiving hugs were exchanges when she was six. That’s not the type of commentary one would expect to see from an organization tasked with building up strong, independent women.

The article continues by suggesting that hugging relatives will warp your daughter’s sense of consent. Further, they suggest that your child  is too dumb to understand the difference between strangers and family, let alone understand the difference between appropriate platonic signs of affection and inappropriate predatory behavior.

This is a weird encroachment into the dynamic of the family unit. If anything, at best, it teaches young girls to be withdrawn, suspect, and rude to their own family members.

But liberals are eating this stuff up on Reddit today:

“I would love for this social norm to be eradicated,” says one user referring to the cultural tradition of hugging your relatives.

I suppose this sort of behavior was guaranteed to develop considering the disintegration of the traditional family unit, but as a nationalist, a prioritized series of loyalties ought to be developed and adhered to and the weakening of family bonds is a tragic loss. The family unit is the most significant, basic unit of the nationalist nation.

We believe in nationalism, first, to benefit and protect our families. From there, our sphere of concern extends to our friends and associates and then outward to our neighbors, townships, states, and country as a whole. If the foundation—the family unit—is destabilized, the nation itself is weakened.

It’s rather difficult to have a bond with your nation if your bond with your own family is on suspect grounds.

One more thing before you go:

FEMINISM UNHINGED: Woman pours bleach on ‘man-spreading’ subway travelers

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NCZOw05L7JA

A new low has been established by the mad-hatter, manipulated, and disturbing legions of liberal feminists.  In this latest rendition a woman was filmed pouring bleach on the crotch of subway travelers in St. Petersberg.

The criminal–or self-stylized activist–Anna Dovgalyuk, 20, will likely become some martyr of the media when she is arrested for assaulting innocent commuters.  Surely, she will be labeled as another victim of Putin’s dictatorship.

It probably doesn’t need to be said but the coverage of this incident is rather atrocious and bordering on encouragement.  “Yasss queen! Own those evil men!” There’s hardly an admonishing headline in sight.

Not her first stunt

This isn’t the first time Dovgalyuk has gained herself attention for uncivilized behavior.  Last year, she uploaded a series of videos where she repeatedly lifted up her skirt at busy subway stations.  Why? Well, good question. She says it was to combat the sexualization of women and the sexual harassment they face.

That makes sense.

As for Anna Dovgalyuk, she’s not learning any lessons any time soon:

Anna, who calls herself a “social activist”, claims the bleach stains are “identification spots” to “immediately understand which body part controls the behaviour of these men.”

The student claimed to be acting “on behalf of everyone who has to endure the manifestations of you declaring your macho qualities on public transportation”.

She also revealed no one has sued her so far, adding: “I don’t think people are going to go to the police to file a report about  jeans.”

If you enjoy what you’ve read, please consider supporting my work.  The easiest way to do so is via my paypal link.

Have you followed my social media accounts? Find them here:
(FB) The American Nationalist
(FB) Deplorable Digest
(TWITTER) TweetBrettMac
(Gab) BrettMac